An Open Letter to the Chapel Hill-Carrboro Board of Education

Updated: Mar 6

View Spanish version of letter

On Thursday, February 18 many of us at home watched with deep sadness and incredulity as the Chapel Hill-Carrboro City School Board moved haltingly, and largely in deafening silence, through a highly flawed process to fill a vacant seat. During the time designated for deliberative decision-making, our elected representatives failed to live up to their own stated commitments to operate with transparency, accountability, and prioritized attention to addressing the racial inequities that continue to shame our district. In our view, Lisa Kaylie, who received the appointment, was a highly qualified, well-respected candidate among other highly qualified well-respected candidates. Our letter is not to suggest that the Board made the wrong decision, but that the process they used was fraught with so many problems, that in the end, it left many of us concerned about how this board makes important decisions.


Nominations

Four board members nominated four candidates from among the twelve they had interviewed. While the Board attorney informed them that their nominations could be accompanied by a supportive statement, none of the Board members chose to offer one.


Deon Temne nominated Courtney McLaughlin, an African American parent who works as a family navigator for the Family Success Alliance, an organization that seeks to break the cycle of poverty so that all children and families in Orange County thrive in schools, jobs, and life. She is also a leader of C.L.A.S.S. (Coalition of Leaders for African-Descendant Student Success) and a leader in the CHCCS Equity Advisory Council. McLaughlin brings knowledge of social systems, policies and education to the board, while also lifting up the voices of under-represented families in our district with whom she has deep relationships.


Ashton Powell nominated Carmen Huerta-Bapat, who used her own experience as a Latina immigrant to guide first-generation college students as the Director of UNC’s Carolina Firsts program where she designed and implemented the first honors program for first-generation college students in the nation. The mother of three girls, Huerta-Bapat went on to receive a doctorate in sociology and is on the faculty in UNC’s Global Studies program. With especially strong relationships with the Latinx community, Huerta-Bapat has spoken of a desire to improve the climate in our schools for minority students, teachers, and staff and the communication between administration, teachers and families.


Mary Ann Wolfe nominated Lisa Kaylie who has been a long-time leader in the CHCCS PTA and very active in the Special Needs Advisory Council. She is the president of Frucon International, an e-commerce services firm. She also has been a board member with the Orange/Chatham Chapter of the Autism Society of NC, Kidzu Children’s Museum, N.C. Therapeutic Riding Center and Extraordinary Ventures. Kaylie is also White and a mother.


Rani Dasi nominated Michele Okoh, an attorney and senior lecturing fellow in Duke’s Environmental Law and Policy Clinic that focuses on environmental justice. She is an expert in justice and equity who is committed to a community-driven approach to fill the needs of the most adversely impacted communities. Okoh is also African American and a mother.


A Secretive and Mostly Silent Process

During the 40 minutes spent on choosing a new board member, only three short comments (each less than 2 minutes) pertaining to two of the candidates were offered. Wholly absent was substantive public discussion about the candidates’ relative attributes and qualifications and how closely these align with the specific, unmet needs of the student body, the Board, the district, and the community.


Instead, we watched as our board members behaved as if the most important thing was that we, the community, would not know what they were thinking or how they were deliberating. Voting occurred through a private electronic ballot, though it was possible to obtain a record afterwards on how the members voted. Surprisingly, Temne did not vote for his nominee, nor did Dasi. After the first round, it was reported that Huerta-Bapat received 3 votes, Kaylie two and McLaughlin one. Because no candidate received a majority of votes, the voting process continued. Three more ballots resulted in tie votes for Carmen Huerta-Bapat and Lisa Kaylie.


After the first tie vote Ashton Powell spoke of his support for Huerta-Bapat, citing the letters, more than he had ever received from Latinx parents, which said she would be a much-needed voice and source of support for them and their children. Before the last round of voting, Board Chair La Serna also spoke in favor of Huerta-Bapat, reading a letter in Spanish, from a Latinx mother, who stated that Huerta-Bapat would be a trusted source of communication and advocate for Latinx students. There was no discussion about the letters. Wolfe then offered a statement arguing for Kaylie’s ability to reach all communities, advocate for children with special needs and “to jump in very quickly” because of her past involvement with the PTA over many years. There was no discussion about relative abilities to reach all communities or be immediately productive. Instead, the board moved, in a 4-2 decision to flip a coin. In the end, Powell, La Serna and Temne voted for Carmen Huerta-Bapat and Wolfe, Dasi, and Broun voted for Lisa Kaylie. The coin flip went in favor of Kaylie.


Where Did Racial Equity Figure in this Decision?

The elephant in the room was the district’s persistent problems with racial inequity. CHCCS is known to be one of the most inequitable school districts in the country. In CHCCS, just as in all other institutions, race is the most salient factor in predicting outcomes, even within every other special category of difference (gender; socioeconomic status, i.e., free and reduced lunch; academically and intellectually gifted; exceptional children). Therefore, in 2017, at the urging of the community, the district committed to using the Racial Equity Impact Assessment (REIA) tool (Race Forward) to guide its work in addressing the structural inequities that have led to profound opportunity and achievement gaps. The REIA tool aids institutions and governmental agencies in making decisions by illuminating the unconscious biases and institutional structures cemented in our belief systems and practices that continue to produce the disparate and unconscionable outcomes we see today. The tool highlights the importance of examining data and of listening to and empowering people in marginalized communities.


But the REIA tool was not used during this important decision. In fact, our district’s stated commitment to consider racial inequity in every decision did not come up during this meeting.


It is not easy to discuss racial, ethnic, and class dynamics in public forums. We are not comfortable with it because we lack the study, practice and tools to guide productive conversations. But the Board’s avoidance of this conversation is unacceptable. Student outcomes and their futures are on the line. Board members must be ready to talk about race, hold each other accountable for racial disparities, and identify policies that preserve racialized inequities.


What We Ask

Our district has made strong commitments to greater transparency, accountability and attention to addressing persistent racial inequities. In light of the failures to live up to these commitments in the appointment of a new board member, we ask the Board to consider the following three requests.


1. We ask that all Board members and district leadership, regardless of race or ethnicity, participate in ongoing, mandatory, in-person, racial equity training, beginning with training in use of the REIA tool. In December a number of CHCCS Board members and administrative personnel participated in a lively workshop led by Race Forward (creators of the REIA tool) with 85 other community members. Workshop leaders emphasized how hard it is to effectively use a tool that seeks to address deep-rooted racial beliefs, assumptions and practices without investing some time to learn and practice using the tool. To address this reality, Race Forward (and other organizations) offer additional workshops specifically designed to better equip institutions to build equitable systems in the communities they serve. We think it is imperative that our district commit to training and improved implementation of the REIA tool as soon as possible. In addition, we highly recommend training provided by the NC-based Racial Equity Institute to help district personnel develop a shared understanding of the history, foundations and dynamics of structural racial inequity in our country. How we diagnose a problem determines how we treat it.


2. Further, as an added aid for better decision making, we call on the Board to include Equity Counsel, much like legal counsel, to be present at all school board meetings. Theoretically this could be the district’s new Equity Director. The position’s job description could include an expectation for training and on-going professional development in racial equity, especially the use of the Racial Equity Impact Assessment. The Equity Director could be charged with holding the district accountable for use of the tool and helping to guide its implementation. This is critical because when racial equity is not consciously considered, racial inequity is often unconsciously replicated. Including the Equity Director/Counsel in Board Meetings, would literally give Equity “a seat at the table” and ensure that racial equity analysis is reflected in all important decisions.


3. Finally, we ask that Board members be willing to engage in challenging conversations and share their deliberations with the public. This is what we need in terms of transparency and accountability. In classrooms across our district, teachers strive to engage students in open, analytical discussion and debate. They ask students to risk discomfort and mistake-making because intellectual risk-taking is necessary for growth, collaboration, innovation and change. Just as we ask students to have tough conversations, we ask our Board to move past avoidance, silence and fear and to model the curiosity and courage needed to think through and address our district’s deepest problems.


It is our hope that we will all learn from the mistakes of this process and move forward with intention. A school culture that prizes equity, justice, transparency and accountability is one that creates intelligent, well-informed, and courageous leaders for the future of our country.


We look forward to hearing your response to our requests.


Campaign for Racial Equity in our Schools Chapel Hill-Carrboro NAACP Executive Committee

1,268 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All
ABOUT US

Welcome to the website of the Chapel Hill-Carrboro Branch of the NAACP!  The mission of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People is to ensure the political, educational, social, and economic equality of rights of all persons and to eliminate race-based discrimination.

ADDRESS

PO Box 1236 

Carrboro, NC 27510

  • Grey Facebook Icon
  • Grey Twitter Icon
  • Grey Instagram Icon
  • YouTube

© 2021